University of Oulu

Kauppila, J.H., Ringborg, C., Johar, A. et al. Gastric Cancer (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-017-0761-2

Health-related quality of life after gastrectomy, esophagectomy, and combined esophagogastrectomy for gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma

Saved in:
Author: Kauppila, Joonas H.1,2; Ringborg, Cecilia3; Johar, Asif3;
Organizations: 1Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
2Cancer and Translational Medicine Research Unit, Medical Research Center Oulu, University of Oulu, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
3Surgical Care Sciences, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
4Division of Cancer Studies, King’s College London and Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, England, UK
Format: article
Version: published version
Access: open
Online Access: PDF Full Text (PDF, 0.6 MB)
Persistent link: http://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi-fe201709128581
Language: English
Published: Springer Verlag, 2017
Publish Date: 2017-09-12
Description:

Abstract

Background The postoperative health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes in patients with gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma after gastrectomy and esophagectomy are unclear. The aim was to evaluate HRQOL outcomes 6 months after extended total gastrectomy, subtotal esophagectomy, and combined esophagogastrectomy.
Methods Patients who underwent surgery for GEJ adenocarcinoma of Siewert type 2 or 3 in 2001–2005 were identified from a nationwide Swedish prospective and population-based cohort. Three surgical strategies, i.e., gastrectomy, esophagectomy, or esophagogastrectomy, were analyzed in relationship to HRQOL measured at 6 months after surgery (main outcome). HRQOL was assessed using well-validated questionnaires for general (EORTC QLQ-C30) and esophageal cancer-specific (EORTC QLQ-OES18) symptoms. Mean score differences (MSD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were analyzed using ANCOVA and adjusted for age, sex, tumor stage, comorbidity, education level, hospital volume, and postoperative complications. MSDs > 10 were regarded as clinically relevant.
Results Among 176 patients with complete information on HRQOL and covariates, none of the MSDs for HRQOL among the three surgery groups were clinically and statistically significant. MSDs comparing esophagectomy and gastrectomy showed no major differences in global quality of life (MSD, +8, 95% CI, 0 to +16), physical function (MSD, +2, 95% CI, −5 to +9), pain (MSD, −3, 95% CI, −12 to +7), or reflux (MSD, +5, 95% CI, −4 to +14). Also, complication rates and 5-year survival rates were similar comparing esophagectomy and gastrectomy.
Conclusions Extended total gastrectomy, subtotal esophagectomy, and combined esophagogastrectomy seemed to yield similar 6-month postoperative HRQOL outcomes for patients with GEJ adenocarcinoma.
see all

Series: Gastric cancer
ISSN: 1436-3291
ISSN-E: 1436-3305
ISSN-L: 1436-3291
Article number: 761
DOI: 10.1007/s10120-017-0761-2
OADOI: https://oadoi.org/10.1007/s10120-017-0761-2
Type of Publication: A1 Journal article – refereed
Field of Science: 3122 Cancers
3126 Surgery, anesthesiology, intensive care, radiology
Subjects:
Funding: Funding was provided by the the Swedish Research Council, Swedish Cancer Society, the Cancer Research Foundations of Radiumhemmet, Sigrid Jusélius Foundation, and Orion Research Foundation. The study sponsors had no role in the design of the study, data collection, analysis, or interpretation of the results, writing of the manuscript, or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest. All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and later versions. Informed consent or a substitute for it was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.
Dataset Reference: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10120-017-0761-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Copyright information: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
  https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/