Karampela, M., Isomursu, M., Porat, T., Maramis, C., Mountford, N., Giunti, G., Chouvarda, I., Lehocki, F. (2019) The Extent and Coverage of Current Knowledge of Connected Health: Systematic Mapping Study. J Med Internet Res, 21 (9), e14394. doi:10.2196/14394
The extent and coverage of current knowledge of connected health : systematic mapping study
|Author:||Karampela, Maria1; Isomursu, Minna2; Porat, Talya3;|
1IT University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen S, Denmark
2University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
3Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
4Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
5Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland
6Slovak University of Technology, Bratislava, Slovakia
|Online Access:||PDF Full Text (PDF, 0.6 MB)|
|Persistent link:|| http://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi-fe2019102835134
|Publish Date:|| 2019-10-28
Background: This study examines the development of the connected health (CH) research landscape with a view to providing an overview of the existing CH research. The research field of CH has experienced rapid growth coinciding with increasing pressure on health care systems to become more proactive and patient centered.
Objective: This study aimed to assess the extent and coverage of the current body of knowledge in CH. In doing so, we sought to identify specific topics that have drawn the attention of CH researchers and to identify research gaps, in particular those offering opportunities for further interdisciplinary research.
Methods: A systematic mapping study that combined scientific contributions from research in the disciplines of medicine, business, computer science, and engineering was used. Overall, seven classification criteria were used to analyze the papers, including publication source, publication year, research type, empirical type, contribution type, research topic, and the medical condition studied.
Results: The search resulted in 208 papers that were analyzed by a multidisciplinary group of researchers. The results indicated a slow start for CH research but showed a more recent steady upswing since 2013. The majority of papers proposed health care solutions (77/208, 37.0%) or evaluated CH approaches (49/208, 23.5%). Case studies (59/208, 28.3%) and experiments (55/208, 26.4%) were the most popular forms of scientific validation used. Diabetes, cancer, multiple sclerosis, and heart conditions were among the most prevalent medical conditions studied.
Conclusions: We conclude that CH research has become an established field of research that has grown over the last five years. The results of this study indicate a focus on technology-driven research with a strong contribution from medicine, whereas the business aspects of CH have received less research attention.
Journal of medical internet research
|Type of Publication:||
A2 Review article in a scientific journal
|Field of Science:||
113 Computer and information sciences
3141 Health care science
This paper is based upon work from European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) Action ENJECT TD 1405, supported by COST. This research has been supported by a grant from the Tatra banka Foundation (2018vs108).
©Maria Karampela, Minna Isomursu, Talya Porat, Christos Maramis, Nicola Mountford, Guido Giunti, Ioanna Chouvarda, Fedor Lehocki. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 25.09.2019. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.