Does ventral rectopexy improve pelvic floor function in the long term? |
|
Author: | Mäkelä-Kaikkonen, Johanna1,2; Rautio, Tero1,2; Kairaluoma, Matti3; |
Organizations: |
1Department of Surgery, Division of Gastroenterology, Oulu University Hospital, Finland 2University of Oulu, Centre of Surgical Research, Medical Research Centre 3Department of Surgery, Keski-Suomi Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland
4Department of Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
5Department of Surgery, Päijät-Häme Central Hospital, Lahti, Finland 6Department of Surgery, University of Turku, Finland |
Format: | article |
Version: | accepted version |
Access: | open |
Online Access: | PDF Full Text (PDF, 2 MB) |
Persistent link: | http://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi-fe2019111237659 |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer,
2018
|
Publish Date: | 2019-11-12 |
Description: |
AbstractBackground: Information is needed on long-term functional results, sequelas, and outcome predictors for laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate long-term function postventral rectopexy in patients with external rectal prolapse or internal rectal prolapse in a large cohort and to identify the possible effects of patient-related factors and operative technical details on patient-reported outcomes. Design: This was a retrospective review with a cross-sectional questionnaire study. Settings: Data were collated from prospectively collected registries in 2 university and 2 central hospitals in Finland. Patients: All 508 consecutive patients treated with ventral rectopexy for external rectal prolapse or symptomatic internal rectal prolapse in 2005 to 2013 were included. Interventions: A questionnaire concerning disease-related symptoms and effect on quality of life was used. Main outcome measures: Defecatory function measured by the Wexner score, the obstructive defecation score, and subjective symptom and quality-of-life evaluation using the visual analog scale were included. The effects of patient-related factors and operative technical details were assessed using multivariate analysis. Results: The questionnaire response rate was 70.7% (330/467 living patients) with a median follow-up time of 44 months. The mean Wexner scores were 7.0 (SD = 6.1) and 6.9 (SD = 5.6), and the mean obstructive defecation scores were 9.7 (SD = 7.6) and 12.3 (SD = 8.0) for patients presenting with external rectal prolapse and internal rectal prolapse. Subjective symptom relief was experienced by 76% and reported more often by patients with external rectal prolapse than with internal rectal prolapse (86% vs 68%; p < 0.001). Complications occurred in 11.4% of patients, and the recurrence rate for rectal prolapse was 7.1%. Limitations: This study was limited by its lack of preoperative functional data and suboptimal questionnaire response rate. Conclusions: Ventral mesh rectopexy effectively treats posterior pelvic floor dysfunction with a low complication rate and an acceptable recurrence rate. Patients with external rectal prolapse benefit more from the operation than those with symptomatic internal rectal prolapse. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A479. see all
|
Series: |
Diseases of the colon & rectum |
ISSN: | 0012-3706 |
ISSN-E: | 1530-0358 |
ISSN-L: | 0012-3706 |
Volume: | 61 |
Issue: | 2 |
Pages: | 230 - 238 |
DOI: | 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000974 |
OADOI: | https://oadoi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000974 |
Type of Publication: |
A1 Journal article – refereed |
Field of Science: |
3126 Surgery, anesthesiology, intensive care, radiology |
Subjects: | |
Copyright information: |
© The ASCRS 2017. This is an Accepted Manuscript that was published in Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. The Definitive Version of Record can be found online at: https://doi.org/10.1097/dcr.0000000000000974. |