Comparison of optic disc evaluation methods in neurology emergency patients
|Author:||Alm, Mikael1; Hautala, Nina2; Bloigu, Risto3;|
1University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
2Department of Ophthalmology, PEDEGO Research Unit and Medical Research Centre, University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
3Medical Informatics Group, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
4Department of Neurology, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
|Online Access:||PDF Full Text (PDF, 0.2 MB)|
|Persistent link:|| http://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi-fe2019120545816
John Wiley & Sons,
|Publish Date:|| 2020-09-13
Background: The optic disc examination is critical for the diagnostics of several acute neurological disorders. However, dilation of the pupil is not recommended for neurological patients, which complicates ophthalmoscopy.
Aims of the study: Present pilot study compared a portable fundus camera to an ophthalmoscope in fundus examinations of neurological emergency patients. To our knowledge, this is the first comparative study of the subject. The fundus photographs were later reviewed with an ophthalmologist.
Methods: The study included 60 adults, volunteer neurological emergency patients with either headache, cerebrovascular disorder, or acute confusional state (delirium). Patients’ non‐mydriatic fundus examination was conducted with an ophthalmoscope and a Smartscope Pro fundus camera.
Results: Fundus photography succeeded in 56 (93%), partially succeeded in 2 (3%), and failed in 2 (3%) cases compared with ophthalmoscopy that succeeded in 35 (58%), partially succeeded in 14 (23%), and failed in 11 (18%) cases (P < 0.0005). The researcher and the ophthalmologist agreed in the findings in 54 out of 58 cases (93%). In six cases (7%), the researcher had failed to detect a non‐critical ophthalmic finding.
Conclusions: The neurological fundus examination by fundus camera seems to be superior to regular ophthalmoscopy in defining the critical optic disc findings in emergency patients.
Acta neurologica scandinavica
|Pages:||449 - 451|
|Type of Publication:||
A1 Journal article – refereed
|Field of Science:||
3124 Neurology and psychiatry
3126 Surgery, anesthesiology, intensive care, radiology
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Alm, M., Hautala, N., Bloigu, R. and Huhtakangas, J. (2019), Comparison of optic disc evaluation methods in neurology emergency patients. Acta Neurol Scand, 140: 449-451, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/ane.13167.
This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.