Realism without representationalism |
|
Author: | Rydenfelt, Henrik1 |
Organizations: |
1University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland |
Format: | article |
Version: | published version |
Access: | open |
Online Access: | PDF Full Text (PDF, 0.2 MB) |
Persistent link: | http://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi-fe202002276774 |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Springer Nature,
2021
|
Publish Date: | 2020-02-27 |
Description: |
AbstractScientific realism is a critical target of anti-representationalists such as Richard Rorty and Huw Price, who have questioned the very possibility of providing a satisfactory argument for realism or any other ontological position. I will argue that there is a viable form of realism which not only withstands this criticism but is vindicated on the antirepresentationalists’ own grounds. This realist position, largely drawn from the notion of the scientific method developed by the founder of philosophical pragmatism, Charles S. Peirce, will further be compared with the accounts of truth and objectivity proposed by the contemporary pragmatists, Rorty, Price, and Robert B. Brandom. see all
|
Series: |
Synthese |
ISSN: | 0039-7857 |
ISSN-E: | 1573-0964 |
ISSN-L: | 0039-7857 |
Volume: | 198 |
Pages: | 2901 - 2918 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11229-019-02251-4 |
OADOI: | https://oadoi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02251-4 |
Type of Publication: |
A1 Journal article – refereed |
Field of Science: |
611 Philosophy |
Subjects: | |
Funding: |
Open access funding provided by University of Oulu including Oulu University Hospital. |
Copyright information: |
© The Author(s) 2019. Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |