Eternal today : the temporality paradox in strategy-making |
|
Author: | Myllykoski, Jenni1; Rantakari, Anniina1 |
Organizations: |
1University of Oulu Business School, Finland |
Format: | article |
Version: | accepted version |
Access: | open |
Online Access: | PDF Full Text (PDF, 0.3 MB) |
Persistent link: | http://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi-fe2020042119533 |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Oxford University Press,
2018
|
Publish Date: | 2020-04-21 |
Description: |
AbstractIn this chapter we focus on temporality in managerial strategy-making. In particular, we adopt an ’in-time’ view to examine strategy-making as the fluidity of the present experience. We draw on a longitudinal, real-time study in a small Finnish software company. On the basis of our analysis, we found five manifestations of ‘in-time’ processuality in strategy-making. We further identify a temporality paradox that arises from the engagement of managers with two contradictory times: constructed linear ‘over time’ and experienced, becoming ‘in time’.These findings lead us to re-evaluate the nature of intention in strategy-making and to elaborate the constitutive relation between time as ‘the passage of nature’ and human agency. Consequently, we argue that temporality should not be treated merely as an objective background or a subjective managerial orientation, but as a fundamental characteristic of processuality that defines the dynamics of strategy-making. see all
|
ISBN Print: | 978-0-19-882743-6 |
Pages: | 124 - 144 |
DOI: | 10.1093/oso/9780198827436.001.0001 |
OADOI: | https://oadoi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198827436.001.0001 |
Host publication: |
Dualities, Dialectics, and Paradoxes in Organizational Life |
Host publication editor: |
Farjoun, Moshe Smith, Wendy Langley, Ann Tsoukas, Haridimos |
Type of Publication: |
A3 Book chapter |
Field of Science: |
512 Business and management |
Subjects: | |
Funding: |
This work was carried out as a part of the Cloud Software and Need for Speed research programs by Digile. |
Copyright information: |
© 2018 Oxford University Press. The final authenticated version is available online https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198827436.001.0001. |