Environmental determinants of lake macrophyte communities in Baikal Siberia
|Author:||Alahuhta, Janne1; Rosbakh, Sergey2; Chepinoga, Victor3,4;|
1Geography Research Unit, University of Oulu, P.O. Box 3000, 90014, Oulu, Finland
2Chair of Ecology and Conservation Biology, University of Regensburg, 93040, Regensburg, Germany
3Laboratory of Physical Geography and Biogeography, The V.B. Sochava Institute of Geography SB RAS, Ulan-Batorskaya Str. 1, 664033, Irkutsk, Russia
4Department of Botany, Irkutsk State University, Karl Marx Str. 1, 664003, Irkutsk, Russia
5Finnish Environment Institute, Freshwater Centre, P.O. Box 413, 90014, Oulu, Finland
|Online Access:||PDF Full Text (PDF, 1.9 MB)|
|Persistent link:|| http://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi-fe2020050424919
|Publish Date:|| 2020-05-04
We investigated whether environmental filtering or dispersal-related factors mostly drive helophyte and hydrophyte species richness and community composition in 93 lakes situated in Baikal Siberia. Using partial linear regression and partial redundancy analysis, we studied (1) what are the relative roles of environmental variables, dispersal variables, spatial processes and region identity (i.e., river basins) in explaining variation in the species richness and species composition of helophytes and hydrophytes across 93 Siberian lakes, and (2) what are the differences in the most important explanatory variables driving community variation in helophytes versus hydrophytes? We found that, for both species richness and species composition, environmental variables clearly explained most variation for both plant groups, followed by region identity and dispersal-related variables. Spatial variables were significant only for the species composition of hydrophytes. Nutrient-salinity index, a proxy for habitat trophic-salinity status, was by far the most significant environmental determinant of helophytes and hydrophytes. Our results indicate that environmental factors explained the most variation in both species richness and species composition of helophytes and hydrophytes. Nevertheless, dispersal-related variables (i.e. spatial and dispersal) were also influential but less important than environmental factors. Furthermore, the dispersal-related variables were more important for hydrophytes than for helophytes. Most brackish permanent lakes were mostly located in the steppe biomes of southern Transbaikalia. This characteristic along with the oldest age, the largest distances to both river and settlements and the lowest temperatures in the study region distinguished them from freshwater, drained and more nutrient-rich floodplain lakes.
|Type of Publication:||
A1 Journal article – refereed
|Field of Science:||
1172 Environmental sciences
Open access funding provided by University of Oulu including Oulu University Hospital.
© The Author(s) 2020. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.