Abstract

This editorial critically reviews design theories, kernel theories, and substantive technologi­cal theories in design science research (DSR) within information systems (IS). The review identifies four different but interrelated interpretations of “design theory” for the design product. In the case of kernel theories, it pays attention to the softening of their scientific status that undermines the status of design theories as well. Substantive technological theories refer to intermediating theories between abstract descrip­tive/explanatory kernel theories and design. The editorial suggests that DSR in IS (DSRIS) has great potential to contribute design-oriented, explanatory/predictive, substantive technological theories. Overall, the review illus­trates excessive use of the word “theory” in DSR. This is in line with the alleged “theory fetish” of information systems.