Hiedanpää, J., Saijets, J., Jounela, P. et al. Beliefs in Conflict: The Management of Teno Atlantic Salmon in the Sámi Homeland in Finland. Environmental Management 66, 1039–1058 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-020-01374-6
Beliefs in conflict : the management of Teno Atlantic salmon in the Sámi homeland in Finland
|Author:||Hiedanpää, Juha1; Saijets, Joni2; Jounela, Pekka1;|
1Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Turku, Finland
2University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
|Online Access:||PDF Full Text (PDF, 3.6 MB)|
|Persistent link:|| http://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi-fe202101252592
|Publish Date:|| 2021-01-25
The subarctic Teno River is one of the most significant spawning rivers for Atlantic salmon in Europe. In 2009, research indicated that the Teno salmon stock was in a weak state, and concern about the future of Atlantic salmon in the Teno River arose on both sides of the river, in Finland and Norway. In 2017, the governments ratified the new Teno fishing agreement (Teno Fishing Act 2017). The agreement aimed to reduce the fishing volume by 30%, and the new regulations concerned all users, including the indigenous Sámi, other locals, tourists, and fishing entrepreneurs. This triggered concern and anger in the Sámi community and among other locals generally. The dispute raised a question concerning the management of Teno salmon. We conducted a Q inquiry with 43 statements, covering aspects of interest, knowledge, management, and policy needs related to Teno salmon. We hypothesised that the key reason for the management tensions lay in how scientific and traditional knowledge fitted administrative knowledge requirements. By using self-organising maps (SOMs), four webs of beliefs emerged from the data: traditional Sámi fishing; salmon protection; equal economic opportunity; and evidence-based decision-making. We also further analysed the statements according to how they reproduced diverging and similar beliefs. We discuss the identity-related struggle, rights, and stakes and the underlying issue of confidence and respect.
|Pages:||1039 - 1058|
|Type of Publication:||
A1 Journal article – refereed
|Field of Science:||
520 Other social sciences
616 Other humanities
We thank the Arctic Academy Programme (ARKTIKO, 2014–2020) of the Academy of Finland for funding the work (project no. 286334). We would also like to thank all the participants in the study. Open access funding provided by Natural Resources Institute Finland (LUKE).
© The Author(s) 2020. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.