Walladbegi J, Schaefer C, Pernevik E, Sämfors S, Kjeller G, Gatenholm P, Sándor GK, Rasmusson L. Three-dimensional bioprinting using a coaxial needle with viscous inks in bone tissue engineering - An In vitro study. Ann Maxillofac Surg 2020;10:370-6, https://doi.org/10.4103/ams.ams_288_20
Three-dimensional bioprinting using a coaxial needle with viscous inks in bone tissue engineering : an In vitro study
|Author:||Walladbegi, Java1; Schaefer, Christian1; Pernevik, Elin2;|
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
2Wallenberg Wood Science Center, Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
3Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical Research Center, University of Oulu, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
4Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Linkoping University Hospital, Linkoping, Sweden
|Online Access:||PDF Full Text (PDF, 1.4 MB)|
|Persistent link:|| http://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi-fe202101262804
|Publish Date:|| 2021-01-26
Introduction: Vascularized autologous tissue grafts are considered “gold standard” for the management of larger bony defects in the craniomaxillofacial area. This modality does however carry limitations, such as the absolute requirement for healthy donor tissues and recipient vessels. In addition, the significant morbidity of large bone graft is deterrent to fibula bone flap use. Therefore, less morbid strategies would be beneficial. The purpose of this study was to develop a printing method to manufacture scaffold structure with viable stem cells.
Materials and Methods: In total, three different combinations of ground beta tri-calcium phosphate and CELLINK (bioinks) were printed with a nozzle to identify a suitable bioink for three-dimensional printing. Subsequently, a coaxial needle, with three different nozzle gauge combinations, was evaluated for printing of the bioinks. Scaffold structures (grids) were then printed alone and with additional adipose stem cells before being transferred into an active medium and incubated overnight. Following incubation, grid stability was evaluated by assessing the degree of maintained grid outline, and cell viability was determined using the live/dead cell assay.
Results: Among the three evaluated combinations of bioinks, two resulted in good printability for bioprinting. Adequate printing was obtained with two out of the three nozzle gauge combinations tested. However, due to the smaller total opening, one combination revealed a better stability. Intact grids with maintained stability were obtained using Ink B23 and Ink B42, and approximately 80% of the printed stem cells were viable following 24 hours.
Discussion: Using a coaxial needle enables printing of a stable scaffold with viable stem cells. Furthermore, cell viability is maintained after the bioprinting process.
Annals of maxillofacial surgery
|Pages:||370 - 376|
|Type of Publication:||
A1 Journal article – refereed
|Field of Science:||
318 Medical biotechnology
The Local Research and Development Council Region Västra Götaland, The Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, is kindly acknowledged for financial support in the framework of the Wallenberg Wood Science Center.
© 2020 Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow. This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.