SDN enhanced resource orchestration of containerized edge applications for industrial IoT |
|
Author: | Okwuibe, Jude1; Haavisto, Juuso2; Harjula, Erkki1; |
Organizations: |
1Center for Wireless Communication, University of Oulu, 90014 Oulu, Finland 2Center for Ubiquitous Computing, University of Oulu, 90014 Oulu, Finland 3VTT Technical Research Center of Finland, 02044 Espoo, Finland |
Format: | article |
Version: | published version |
Access: | open |
Online Access: | PDF Full Text (PDF, 2.8 MB) |
Persistent link: | http://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi-fe202101283010 |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers,
2020
|
Publish Date: | 2021-01-28 |
Description: |
AbstractWith the rise of the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT), there is an intense pressure on resource and performance optimization leveraging on existing technologies, such as Software Defined Networking (SDN), edge computing, and container orchestration. Industry 4.0 emphasizes the importance of lean and efficient operations for sustainable manufacturing. Achieving this goal would require engineers to consider all layers of the system, from hardware to software, and optimizing for resource efficiency at all levels. This emphasizes the need for container-based virtualization tools such as Docker and Kubernetes, offering Platform as a Service (PaaS), while simultaneously leveraging on edge technologies to reduce related latencies. For network management, SDN is poised to offer a cost-effective and dynamic scalability solution by customizing packet handling for various edge applications and services. In this paper, we investigate the energy and latency trade-offs involved in combining these technologies for industrial applications. As a use case, we emulate a 3D-drone-based monitoring system aimed at providing real-time visual monitoring of industrial automation. We compare a native implementation to a containerized implementation where video processing is orchestrated while streaming is handled by an external UE representing the IIoT device. We compare these two scenarios for energy utilization, latency, and responsiveness. Our test results show that only roughly 16 percent of the total power consumption happens on the mobile node when orchestrated. Virtualization adds up about 4.5 percent of the total power consumption while the latency difference between the two approaches becomes negligible after the streaming session is initialized. see all
|
Series: |
IEEE access |
ISSN: | 2169-3536 |
ISSN-E: | 2169-3536 |
ISSN-L: | 2169-3536 |
Volume: | 8 |
Pages: | 229117 - 229131 |
DOI: | 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3045563 |
OADOI: | https://oadoi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3045563 |
Type of Publication: |
A1 Journal article – refereed |
Field of Science: |
213 Electronic, automation and communications engineering, electronics |
Subjects: | |
Funding: |
This work was supported in part by the Academy of Finland 6Genesis Flagship under Grant 318927, and in part by the AI Enhanced Mobile Edge Computing project, funded by the Future Makers program of Jane and Aatos Erkko Foundation and Technology Industries of Finland Centennial Foundation. The work of Ijaz Ahmad was supported by the Jorma Ollila Grant. |
Academy of Finland Grant Number: |
318927 |
Detailed Information: |
318927 (Academy of Finland Funding decision) |
Copyright information: |
© The Authors 2020. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. For more information, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |