Transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with bicuspid aortic valve |
|
Author: | Husso, Annastiina1; Airaksinen, Juhani2; Juvonen, Tatu3,4; |
Organizations: |
1Heart Center, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland 2Heart Center, Turku University Hospital, and University of Turku, Turku, Finland 3Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4, P.O. Box 340, 00029, Helsinki, Finland
4Research Unit of Surgery, Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
5Heart Hospital, Tampere University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland 6Department of Internal Medicine, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland |
Format: | article |
Version: | published version |
Access: | open |
Online Access: | PDF Full Text (PDF, 1 MB) |
Persistent link: | http://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi-fe2021042111288 |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Springer Nature,
2021
|
Publish Date: | 2021-04-21 |
Description: |
AbstractObjectives: To compare the outcomes after surgical (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for severe stenosis of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). Methods: We evaluated the early and mid-term outcome of patients with stenotic BAV who underwent SAVR or TAVR for aortic stenosis from the nationwide FinnValve registry. Results: The FinnValve registry included 6463 AS patients and 1023 (15.8%) of them had BAV. SAVR was performed in 920 patients and TAVR in 103 patients with BAV. In the overall series, device success after TAVR was comparable to SAVR (94.2% vs. 97.1%, p = 0.115). TAVR was associated with increased rate of mild-to-severe paravalvular regurgitation (PVR) (19.4% vs. 7.9%, p < 0.0001) and of moderate-to-severe PVR (2.9% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.053). When newer-generation TAVR devices were evaluated, mild-to-severe PVR (11.9% vs. 7.9%, p = 0.223) and moderate-to-severe PVR (0% vs. 0.7%, p = 1.000) were comparable to SAVR. Type 1 N-L and type 2 L-R/R-N were the BAV morphologies with higher incidence of mild-to-severe PVR (37.5% and 100%, adjusted for new-generation prostheses p = 0.025) compared to other types of BAVs. Among 75 propensity score-matched cohorts, 30-day mortality was 1.3% after TAVR and 5.3% after SAVR (p = 0.375), and 2-year mortality was 9.7% after TAVR and 18.7% after SAVR (p = 0.268). Conclusions: In patients with stenotic BAV, TAVR seems to achieve early and mid-term results comparable to SAVR. Type 1 N-L and type 2 L-R/R-N BAV morphologies had higher incidence of PVR. Larger studies evaluating different phenotypes of BAV are needed to confirm these findings. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03385915. see all
|
Series: |
Clinical research in cardiology |
ISSN: | 1861-0684 |
ISSN-E: | 1861-0692 |
ISSN-L: | 1861-0684 |
Volume: | 110 |
Issue: | 3 |
Pages: | 429 - 439 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00392-020-01761-3 |
OADOI: | https://oadoi.org/10.1007/s00392-020-01761-3 |
Type of Publication: |
A1 Journal article – refereed |
Field of Science: |
3121 General medicine, internal medicine and other clinical medicine |
Subjects: | |
Funding: |
Open access funding provided by University of Oulu including Oulu University Hospital.. This study was performed without external funding. |
Copyright information: |
© The Author(s) 2020. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |