University of Oulu

Balotari-Chiebao, F., Brommer, J.E., Tikkanen, H. et al. Habitat use by post-fledging white-tailed eagles shows avoidance of human infrastructure and agricultural areas. Eur J Wildl Res 67, 39 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-021-01482-6

Habitat use by post-fledging white-tailed eagles shows avoidance of human infrastructure and agricultural areas

Saved in:
Author: Balotari-Chiebao, Fabio1; Brommer, Jon E.1; Tikkanen, Hannu2;
Organizations: 1Section of Ecology, Department of Biology, University of Turku, FI-20014, Turku, Finland
2Ecology and Genetics Research Unit, University of Oulu, P.O. Box 3000, 90014, Oulu, Finland
Format: article
Version: published version
Access: open
Online Access: PDF Full Text (PDF, 0.5 MB)
Persistent link: http://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi-fe2021051029469
Language: English
Published: Springer Nature, 2021
Publish Date: 2021-05-10
Description:

Abstract

Habitat use studies provide invaluable information for the conservation of species that suffer from habitat loss or degradation. We used satellite telemetry to study the habitat use of white-tailed eagles (Haliaeetus albicilla) in relation to six habitat classes (artificial surfaces, agricultural areas, forests, semi-natural areas, wetlands and waterbodies) and five forest age classes (0–9, 10–19, 20–59, 60–99 and ≥ 100 years old) during the post-fledging period in Finland. The post-fledging period, defined here as the period between fledging and dispersal from the natal area, is a critical life-history stage. Our primary objective was to provide information that could be integrated into landscape planning, including wind-energy development (which poses a threat to white-tailed eagles). We found that the habitat classes that were selected by the young white-tailed eagles were forests, semi-natural areas (i.e., transitional woodland and bare rock) and wetlands. When using forests, the eagles selected stands of 0–9 years old, presumably due to the use of retention trees surrounded by a clear-cut as perching sites. Conversely, the habitat classes that were avoided were artificial surfaces, agricultural areas and (the immediate vicinity of) waterbodies. We conclude that the conversion of natural habitats into built and agricultural areas is detrimental to young white-tailed eagles because it reduces habitat availability. They, however, appear to be capable of using forests recently impacted by forestry if perch trees are present. Careful landscape planning is needed to protect priority habitats and avoid conflicts with an expanding white-tailed eagle population (e.g., by building wind farms in areas already environmentally disturbed).

see all

Series: European journal of wildlife research
ISSN: 1612-4642
ISSN-E: 1439-0574
ISSN-L: 1612-4642
Volume: 67
Issue: 3
Article number: 39
DOI: 10.1007/s10344-021-01482-6
OADOI: https://oadoi.org/10.1007/s10344-021-01482-6
Type of Publication: A1 Journal article – refereed
Field of Science: 1181 Ecology, evolutionary biology
Subjects:
Funding: Open access funding provided by University of Turku (UTU) including Turku University Central Hospital.
Copyright information: © The Author(s) 2021. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
  https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/