Haataja, E., Malmberg, J., Dindar, M. et al. The pivotal role of monitoring for collaborative problem solving seen in interaction, performance, and interpersonal physiology. Metacognition Learning (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-021-09279-3
The pivotal role of monitoring for collaborative problem solving seen in interaction, performance, and interpersonal physiology
|Author:||Haataja, Eetu1; Malmberg, Jonna1; Dindar, Muhterem1;|
1Faculty of Education, Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit (LET), University of Oulu, P.O. Box 2000, 90014, Oulu, Finland
|Online Access:||PDF Full Text (PDF, 1.4 MB)|
|Persistent link:|| http://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi-fe2021121360218
|Publish Date:|| 2021-12-13
Being aware of the progress towards one’s goals is considered one of the main characteristics of the self-regulation process. This is also the case for collaborative problem solving, which invites group members to metacognitively monitor the progress with their goals and externalize it in social interactions while solving a problem. Monitoring challenges can activate group members to control the situation together, which can be seen as adjustments on different systemic levels (physiological, psychological, and interpersonal) of a collaborative group. This study examines how the pivotal role of monitoring for collaborative problem solving is reflected in interactions, performance, and interpersonal physiology. The study has foci in two central characteristics of monitoring interactions that facilitate groups’ regulation in reaching their goals. First is valence of monitoring, indicating whether the group members think they are progressing towards their goal or not. Second is equality of participation in monitoring interactions between group members. Participants of the study were volunteering higher education students (N = 57), randomly assigned to groups of three members whose collaborative task was to learn to run a business simulation. The collaborative task was video recorded, and the physiological arousal of each participant was recorded from their electrodermal activity. The results of the study suggest that both the valence and equality of participation are identifiable in monitoring interactions and they both positively predict groups’ performance in the task. Equality of participation to monitoring was not related to the interpersonal physiology. However, valence of monitoring was related to interpersonal physiology in terms of physiological synchrony and arousal. The findings support the view that characteristics of monitoring interactions make a difference to task performance in collaborative problem solving and that interpersonal physiology relates to these characteristics.
Metacognition and learning
|Type of Publication:||
A1 Journal article – refereed
|Field of Science:||
516 Educational sciences
Open access funding provided by University of Oulu including Oulu University Hospital. This work was supported by the Academy of Finland [Grant numbers, 324381, 308809, 297686] and University of Oulu.
|Academy of Finland Grant Number:||
324381 (Academy of Finland Funding decision)
308809 (Academy of Finland Funding decision)
297686 (Academy of Finland Funding decision)
© The Author(s) 2021. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.