Abstract

Background: Software vulnerabilities are weaknesses in source code that might be exploited to cause harm or loss. Previous work has proposed a number of automated machine learning approaches to detect them. Most of these techniques work at release-level, meaning that they aim at predicting the files that will potentially be vulnerable in a future release. Yet, researchers have shown that a commit-level identification of source code issues might better fit the developer’s needs, speeding up their resolution.

Objective: To investigate how currently available machine learning-based vulnerability detection mechanisms can support developers in the detection of vulnerabilities at commit-level.

Method: We perform an empirical study where we consider nine projects accounting for 8991 commits and experiment with eight machine learners built using process, product, and textual metrics.

Results: We point out three main findings: (1) basic machine learners rarely perform well; (2) the use of ensemble machine learning algorithms based on boosting can substantially improve the performance; and (3) the combination of more metrics does not necessarily improve the classification capabilities.

Conclusions: Further research should focus on just-in-time vulnerability detection, especially with respect to the introduction of smart approaches for feature selection and training strategies.