Yu, X., Aceituno, J.F., Kurvinen, E. et al. Comparison of numerical and computational aspects between two constraint-based contact methods in the description of wheel/rail contacts. Multibody Syst Dyn 54, 303–344 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-022-09811-6
Comparison of numerical and computational aspects between two constraint-based contact methods in the description of wheel/rail contacts
|Author:||Yu, Xinxin1; Aceituno, Javier F.2; Kurvinen, Emil3;|
1Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, LUT University, Lappeenranta, Finland
2Dept. of Mechanical and Mining Engineering, University of Jaén, Jaén, Spain
3Dept. of Materials and Mechanical Engineering, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
4Mevea Ltd., Lappeenranta, Finland
5Dept. of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Seville, Seville, Spain
|Online Access:||PDF Full Text (PDF, 4.2 MB)|
|Persistent link:|| http://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi-fe2022053139902
|Publish Date:|| 2022-05-31
The numerical and computation aspects of the Knife-edge Equivalent Contact (KEC) constraint and lookup table (LUT) methods are compared in this paper. The LUT method implementation uses a penetration-based elastic contact model for the flange and a constraint-based formulation at the wheel tread. For the KEC method, where an infinitely narrow rail contacts an equivalent wheel, regularization of the tread-flange transition is adopted to simultaneously account for tread and flange contacts using constraints. A comparison between the two methods is carried out using well-known numerical integrators to show the applicability and limitations of both methods.
Two fixed-step-size integrators, the explicit Runge–Kutta (RK4) and the predictor–corrector Adam–Bashforth–Moulton (ABM) methods, and two variable-step-size Matlab built-in function integrators, the explicit ode45 and implicit ode15s, were applied to get the numerical solutions to the dynamic problems and study the relative numerical performance of the two contact description methods. To complete the railway vehicle model, both contact methods were implemented for the multibody model of a benchmark railway vehicle (the Manchester wagon 1). Numerical results were obtained for different railway tracks with and without irregularities. Profiles of the S1002 wheel and LB-140-Area rail, which demonstrate the two-point contact phenomenon, were considered. Both methods were implemented in Matlab and validated against commercial simulation software. The kinematic results for both approaches show good agreement, but the KEC method was up to 20% more efficient than the LUT method regardless of integrator used.
Multibody system dynamics
|Pages:||303 - 344|
|Type of Publication:||
A1 Journal article – refereed
|Field of Science:||
214 Mechanical engineering
The authors thank for the support given by Business of Finland under the SmartTram-LUT project with reference 6292/31/2018. In addition, the authors thank for the help of the Andalusian Regional Government, in Spain, under the PAIDI 2020 program with project reference P18-RT-1772. All this support is gratefully acknowledged.
© The Author(s) 2022. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.