Comparison of one-part and two-part alkali-activated metakaolin and blast furnace slag |
|
Author: | Segura, Isabel Pol1; Luukkonen, Tero2; Yliniemi, Juho2; |
Organizations: |
1Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, 2800, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark 2Department of Fibre and Particle Engineering Research Unit, University of Oulu, 90570, Oulu, Finland 3Department of Research and Development, FLSmidth, 2500, Valby, Denmark
4NMR Research Unit, Faculty of Science, University of Oulu, P.O. Box 3000, 90014, Oulu, Finland
|
Format: | article |
Version: | published version |
Access: | open |
Online Access: | PDF Full Text (PDF, 2.4 MB) |
Persistent link: | http://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi-fe2022101762250 |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Springer Nature,
2022
|
Publish Date: | 2022-10-17 |
Description: |
AbstractOne-part alkali-activated materials prepared with solid-form alkali activator are gaining attention in the construction industry, as they are an easier and safer approach for cast-in-situ applications in comparison with two-part approach (i.e., involving the use of alkali-activator solutions). The present study compares the one-part and conventional two-part mixing methods with two aluminosilicate precursors, metakaolin and ground granulated blast-furnace slag, using identical mix designs (in terms of molar ratios of SiO₂, Al₂O₃, and Na₂O) with both preparation methods. The results revealed that using one-part mix delays the setting time, increases the heat of reaction, decreases the shrinkage, and reaches between 80 and 85% of the compressive strength of the two-part mix. In addition, scanning electron microscopy, thermogravimetric analysis, and X-ray diffraction analysis showed no major differences between one- and two-part. However, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy and magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance experiments indicated that the extent of reaction in two-part alkali-activated mixes is higher than for one-part. see all
|
Series: |
Journal of sustainable metallurgy |
ISSN: | 2199-3823 |
ISSN-E: | 2199-3831 |
ISSN-L: | 2199-3823 |
Volume: | 8 |
Pages: | 1816 - 1830 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s40831-022-00606-9 |
OADOI: | https://oadoi.org/10.1007/s40831-022-00606-9 |
Type of Publication: |
A1 Journal article – refereed |
Field of Science: |
216 Materials engineering |
Subjects: | |
Funding: |
This work was supported by the ProBu project: Process Technology for Sustainable Building Materials Production (Grant Number: 8055-00014B) funded by Innovation Fund Denmark, as well as FLSmidth A/S, Rockwool International A/S and Technical University of Denmark. Tero Luukkonen and Juho Yliniemi wish to acknowledge funding from the Academy of Finland (Grant Numbers 326291 and 322786, respectively). |
Academy of Finland Grant Number: |
322786 |
Detailed Information: |
322786 (Academy of Finland Funding decision) |
Copyright information: |
© The Author(s) 2022. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |