Palaeontology meets metacommunity ecology : the Maastrichtian dinosaur fossil record of North America as a case study |
|
Author: | García-Girón, Jorge1; Heino, Jani2; Alahuhta, Janne3; |
Organizations: |
1Ecology Unit, University of León, Campus de Vegazana S/N, 24071 León, Spain 2Freshwater Centre, Finnish Environment Institute, PO Box 413, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland 3Geography Research Unit, University of Oulu, PO Box 3000, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland
4Department of Earth Sciences, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT UK
5School of GeoSciences, Grant Institute, University of Edinburgh, James Hutton Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3FE UK |
Format: | article |
Version: | accepted version |
Access: | open |
Online Access: | PDF Full Text (PDF, 1 MB) |
Persistent link: | http://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi-fe2023030629768 |
Language: | English |
Published: |
John Wiley & Sons,
2021
|
Publish Date: | 2023-03-06 |
Description: |
AbstractDocumenting the patterns and potential associated processes of ancient biotas has always been a central challenge in palaeontology. Over recent decades, intense debate has focused on the organization of dinosaur-dominated communities, yet no general consensus has been reached on how these communities were organized in a spatial context. Here, we used analytical routines typically applied in metacommunity ecology to provide novel insights into dinosaurian distributions across the latest Cretaceous of North America. To do this, we combined fossil occurrences with functional, phylogenetic and palaeoenvironmental modelling, and adopted the perspective that more reasonable conclusions on palaeoecological reconstructions can be gained from studies that consider the organization of biotas along ecological gradients at multiple spatial scales. Our results showed that dinosaurs were restricted in range to different parts of the Hell Creek Formation, prompting the recognition of discrete and compartmentalized faunal areas during the Maastrichtian at fine-grained scales, whereas taxa with the broadest ranges included those with narrower distributions when combining data from various geological formations across the Western Interior of North America. Although groups of dinosaurs had coincident range boundaries, their communities responded to multiple ecologically-important gradients when compensating for differences in sampling effort. Metacommunity structures of both ornithischians and theropods were correlated with climatic barriers and potential trophic relationships between herbivores and carnivores, thereby suggesting that dinosaurian faunas were shaped by physiological constraints, limited food resources abundance, and a combination of bottom-up and top-down forces across multiple spatial grains and extents. see all
|
Series: |
Palaeontology |
ISSN: | 0031-0239 |
ISSN-E: | 1475-4983 |
ISSN-L: | 0031-0239 |
Volume: | 64 |
Issue: | 3 |
Pages: | 335 - 357 |
DOI: | 10.1111/pala.12526 |
OADOI: | https://oadoi.org/10.1111/pala.12526 |
Type of Publication: |
A1 Journal article – refereed |
Field of Science: |
1181 Ecology, evolutionary biology |
Subjects: | |
Funding: |
JGG appreciates financial support from the University of León (grant no. 2017), the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Industry (grant no. CGL2017-84176R) and from the Junta of Castilla y León (grant no. LE004G18). JH and JA received support (in part) from the Academy of Finland (grant no. 331957 and grant no. 322652, respectively). AAC was supported as a Research Assistant at University College London. SLB'S work on the Cretaceous–Palaeogene transition is supported by a European Research Council Starting Grant (ERC StG 2017, 756226, PalM). |
Academy of Finland Grant Number: |
322652 |
Detailed Information: |
322652 (Academy of Finland Funding decision) |
Copyright information: |
© 2021 The Palaeontological Association. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: García-Girón, J., Heino, J., Alahuhta, J., Chiarenza, A.A. and Brusatte, S.L. (2021), Palaeontology meets metacommunity ecology: the Maastrichtian dinosaur fossil record of North America as a case study. Palaeontology, 64: 335-357, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/pala.12526. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. This article may not be enhanced, enriched or otherwise transformed into a derivative work, without express permission from Wiley or by statutory rights under applicable legislation. Copyright notices must not be removed, obscured or modified. The article must be linked to Wiley’s version of record on Wiley Online Library and any embedding, framing or otherwise making available the article or pages thereof by third parties from platforms, services and websites other than Wiley Online Library must be prohibited. |