University of Oulu

Stoor, K., Karvonen, E., Liinamaa, J. and Saarela, V. (2018), Evaluating refraction and visual acuity with the Nidek autorefractometer AR-360A in a randomized population-based screening study. Acta Ophthalmol, 96: 384-389. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.13636

Evaluating refraction and visual acuity with the Nidek autorefractometer AR-360A in a randomized population-based screening study

Saved in:
Author: Stoor, Katri1; Karvonen, Elina1; Liinamaa, Johanna1;
Organizations: 1Department of Ophthalmology, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
Format: article
Version: accepted version
Access: open
Online Access: PDF Full Text (PDF, 2.7 MB)
Persistent link: http://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi-fe2023030830602
Language: English
Published: John Wiley & Sons, 2017
Publish Date: 2023-03-08
Description:

Abstract

Purpose: The evaluation of visual acuity (VA) and refraction in the Northern Finland Birth Cohort Eye study was performed using the Nidek AR-360A autorefractometer. The accuracy of the method for this population-based screening study was assessed.

Methods: Measurements of the refractive error were obtained from the right eyes of 1238 subjects (mean age 47), first objectively with the AR-360A and then subjectively by an optometrist. Agreement with the subjective refraction was calculated for sphere, cylinder, mean spherical equivalent (MSE), cylindrical vectors J₄₅ and J₀ and presbyopic correction (add). Visual acuity (VA) was measured using an ETDRS chart and the autorefractometer.

Results: The refractive error measured with the AR-360A was higher than the subjective refraction performed by the optometrist for sphere (0.007 D ± 0.24 D p = 0.30) and also for cylinder (−0.16 D ± 0.20 D p < 0.0005). The bias between the measurements of MSE, J₄₅ and J₀ was low: −0.07 D ± 0.22 D (p = 0.002), 0.01 D ± 0.43 D (p = 0.25) and −0.01 D ± 0.42 D (p = 0.43), respectively. The amount of add measured by the autorefractometer was higher than the subjective 0.35 D ± 0.29 D (p < 0.0005). There was a statistically significant correlation between VA (p < 0.0005) and the difference between the subjective and objective refraction. In 99.2% of the measurements, visual values were within one decimal line of each other.

Conclusion: The Nidek AR-360A autorefractometer is an accurate tool for determining the refraction and VA in a clinical screening trial.

see all

Series: Acta ophthalmologica
ISSN: 1755-375X
ISSN-E: 1755-3776
ISSN-L: 1755-375X
Volume: 96
Issue: 4
Pages: 384 - 389
DOI: 10.1111/aos.13636
OADOI: https://oadoi.org/10.1111/aos.13636
Type of Publication: A1 Journal article – refereed
Field of Science: 3125 Otorhinolaryngology, ophthalmology
Subjects:
Copyright information: © 2017 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Stoor, K., Karvonen, E., Liinamaa, J. and Saarela, V. (2018), Evaluating refraction and visual acuity with the Nidek autorefractometer AR-360A in a randomized population-based screening study. Acta Ophthalmol, 96: 384-389, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.13636. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving