Evaluating refraction and visual acuity with the Nidek autorefractometer AR-360A in a randomized population-based screening study |
|
Author: | Stoor, Katri1; Karvonen, Elina1; Liinamaa, Johanna1; |
Organizations: |
1Department of Ophthalmology, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland |
Format: | article |
Version: | accepted version |
Access: | open |
Online Access: | PDF Full Text (PDF, 2.7 MB) |
Persistent link: | http://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi-fe2023030830602 |
Language: | English |
Published: |
John Wiley & Sons,
2017
|
Publish Date: | 2023-03-08 |
Description: |
AbstractPurpose: The evaluation of visual acuity (VA) and refraction in the Northern Finland Birth Cohort Eye study was performed using the Nidek AR-360A autorefractometer. The accuracy of the method for this population-based screening study was assessed. Methods: Measurements of the refractive error were obtained from the right eyes of 1238 subjects (mean age 47), first objectively with the AR-360A and then subjectively by an optometrist. Agreement with the subjective refraction was calculated for sphere, cylinder, mean spherical equivalent (MSE), cylindrical vectors J₄₅ and J₀ and presbyopic correction (add). Visual acuity (VA) was measured using an ETDRS chart and the autorefractometer. Results: The refractive error measured with the AR-360A was higher than the subjective refraction performed by the optometrist for sphere (0.007 D ± 0.24 D p = 0.30) and also for cylinder (−0.16 D ± 0.20 D p < 0.0005). The bias between the measurements of MSE, J₄₅ and J₀ was low: −0.07 D ± 0.22 D (p = 0.002), 0.01 D ± 0.43 D (p = 0.25) and −0.01 D ± 0.42 D (p = 0.43), respectively. The amount of add measured by the autorefractometer was higher than the subjective 0.35 D ± 0.29 D (p < 0.0005). There was a statistically significant correlation between VA (p < 0.0005) and the difference between the subjective and objective refraction. In 99.2% of the measurements, visual values were within one decimal line of each other. Conclusion: The Nidek AR-360A autorefractometer is an accurate tool for determining the refraction and VA in a clinical screening trial. see all
|
Series: |
Acta ophthalmologica |
ISSN: | 1755-375X |
ISSN-E: | 1755-3776 |
ISSN-L: | 1755-375X |
Volume: | 96 |
Issue: | 4 |
Pages: | 384 - 389 |
DOI: | 10.1111/aos.13636 |
OADOI: | https://oadoi.org/10.1111/aos.13636 |
Type of Publication: |
A1 Journal article – refereed |
Field of Science: |
3125 Otorhinolaryngology, ophthalmology |
Subjects: | |
Copyright information: |
© 2017 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Stoor, K., Karvonen, E., Liinamaa, J. and Saarela, V. (2018), Evaluating refraction and visual acuity with the Nidek autorefractometer AR-360A in a randomized population-based screening study. Acta Ophthalmol, 96: 384-389, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.13636. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving |