Rain-like layer removal from hot-rolled steel strip based on attentive dual residual generative adversarial network |
|
Author: | Luo, Qiwu1; He, Handong1; Liu, Kexin1; |
Organizations: |
1School of Automation, Central South University, Changsha, China 2Center for Machine Vision and Signal Analysis (CMVS), University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland 3College of Electronic Science, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, China |
Format: | article |
Version: | accepted version |
Access: | open |
Online Access: | PDF Full Text (PDF, 2.3 MB) |
Persistent link: | http://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi-fe2023052648437 |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers,
2023
|
Publish Date: | 2023-05-26 |
Description: |
AbstractRain-like layer removal from hot-rolled steel strip surface has been proven to be a workable measure for suppressing the false alarms frequently triggered in automated visual inspection (AVI) instruments. This article extends the scope of the “rain-like layer” from dispersed waterdrops to splashing water streaks and tiny white droplets. And a targeted method with both channel-wise and spatial-wise attention, namely attentive dual residual generative adversarial network (ADRGAN), is proposed. Meanwhile, a newly updated steel surface image dataset with typical natures of a “rain-like layer” gathered from an actual hot-rolling line, Steel_Rain, is opened for the first time. The comparison of experimental results between our proposed network and 11 prestigious networks shows that our ADRGAN-restored images are the closest to the ground-truth images on six public datasets, especially on the newly opened industrial dataset Steel_Rain; it yields the best scores of 56.8627 peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR), 0.9980 structural similarity index (SSIM), 0.134 mean-square error (MSE) and 0.006 learned perceptual image patch similarity (LPIPS). In the final verification test, the concept of rain-like layer removal has been proved to perform best in defect inspection, where four traditional defect detection algorithms are involved. And as expected, defect detection methods assisted by ADRGAN yield the minimum false alarms. see all
|
Series: |
IEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement |
ISSN: | 0018-9456 |
ISSN-E: | 1557-9662 |
ISSN-L: | 0018-9456 |
Volume: | 72 |
Article number: | 5011715 |
DOI: | 10.1109/TIM.2023.3265761 |
OADOI: | https://oadoi.org/10.1109/TIM.2023.3265761 |
Type of Publication: |
A1 Journal article – refereed |
Field of Science: |
213 Electronic, automation and communications engineering, electronics |
Subjects: | |
Funding: |
This work was supported jointly by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Number: 61973323 and 62111530071); Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Number: 2021JJ20078); Science and Technology Innovation Program of Hunan Province (Grant Number: 2021RC3019). |
Copyright information: |
© 2023 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works. |