Abstract

Histological analysis with microscopy is the gold standard to diagnose and stage cancer, where slides or whole slide images are analyzed for cell morphological and spatial features by pathologists. The nuclei of cancerous cells are characterized by nonuniform chromatin distribution, irregular shapes, and varying size. As nucleus area and shape alone carry prognostic value, detection and segmentation of nuclei are among the most important steps in disease grading. However, evaluation of nuclei is a laborious, time-consuming, and subjective process with large variation among pathologists. Recent advances in digital pathology have allowed significant applications in nuclei detection, segmentation, and classification, but automated image analysis is greatly affected by staining factors, scanner variability, and imaging artifacts, requiring robust image preprocessing, normalization, and segmentation methods for clinically satisfactory results. In this paper, we aimed to evaluate and compare the digital image analysis techniques used in clinical pathology and research in the setting of gastric cancer. A literature review was conducted to evaluate potential methods of improving nuclei detection. Digitized images of 35 patients from a retrospective cohort of gastric adenocarcinoma at Oulu University Hospital in 1987–2016 were annotated for nuclei (n = 9085) by expert pathologists and 14 images of different cancer types from public TCGA dataset with annotated nuclei (n = 7000) were used as a comparison to evaluate applicability in other cancer types. The detection and segmentation accuracy with the selected color normalization and stain separation techniques were compared between the methods. The extracted information can be supplemented by patient’s medical data and fed to the existing statistical clinical tools or subjected to subsequent AI-assisted classification and prediction models. The performance of each method is evaluated by several metrics against the annotations done by expert pathologists. The F1-measure of 0.854 ± 0.068 is achieved with color normalization for the gastric cancer dataset, and 0.907 ± 0.044 with color deconvolution for the public dataset, showing comparable results to the earlier state-of-the-art works. The developed techniques serve as a basis for further research on application and interpretability of AI-assisted tools for gastric cancer diagnosis.